Institution Evaluation

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the institutions abilities to use and integrate TeenSmart methods and materials to enrich existing activities and curriculum. Please answer the following questions honestly. Thank you for taking time to respond and for your ideas and suggestions.

institution: Select the institution Asociación Obras del Espíritu Santo - Cristo Rey EBAIS y Liceo de Escazú Escuela Enrique Strachan Centro Infantil Manantial Colegio Monterrey Cruz Roja de Rivas Instituto Experimental de la Asunción Instituto José Ramírez Goyena Instituto Maestro Gabriel Juan José Rodríguez PROAA Asociación Roblealto PROVADENIC

Which of the following best represents your position in the institution?

1. How would you rate the administration’s support for integrating and using TeenSmart electronic tools to enrich existing institutional activities and curriculum?

Poor Good Very Good Excellent
Comments:

2. How would you rate the ability of the leadership team to develop and implement an Annual Plan to integrate TeenSmart’s electronic tools, methods, and materials to enrich existing institutional activities and curriculum (objectives, people responsible, calendar etc)?

Poor Good Very Good Excellent
Comments:

3. How would you rate the leadership team’s ability to work together (i.e. periodic meetings, teamwork, problem solving etc.) to use and integrate TeenSmart’s electronic tools, materials and methods into institutional activities and the curriculum?

Poor Good  Very Good Excellent
Comments:

4. How would you rate TeenSmart’s familiarity throughout the institution? (For example: is it known to students, faculty, staff, parents etc.)?

Poor Good Very Good   Excellent
Comments:

5. How would you rate the effectiveness of integrating TeenSmart methods and materials into existing classes and curriculum?

Poor Good  Very Good Excellent
Comments:

6. How would you rate the effectiveness of integrating TeenSmart methods and materials into existing counseling services and activities?

Poor Good Very Good Excellent
Comments:

7. How would you rate the integration of TeenSmart methods and materials to enrich other institutional activities (i.e. health or science fairs, parent meetings, etc.)?

Poor Good Very Good Excellent
Comments:

8. How would you rate the computer laboratory schedule; which ensures each participant an assigned day and time for accessing TeenSmart materials and methods?

Poor Good Very Good Excellent
Comments:

9. How would you rate the laboratory teacher’s interest and ability to support and supervise the TeenSmart participants?

Poor Good Very Good Excellent
Comments:

10. How would you rate the stability of the Internet service?

Poor Good Very Good Excellent
Comments:

11. How would you rate the success of engaging the young people to plan and carry out a TeenSmart graduation?

Poor Good Very Good Excellent
Comments:

12. How helpful was TeenSmart during the registration process, completing the profiles (baseline and follow-up), implementation, and the development of the program?

Poco Good Very Good Excellent

Comments:

Acceptability of the website  www.teensmart.net

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the TeenSmart website www.teensmart.net for adolescents. Please answer the following questions honestly. Thank you for your time to respond and for your ideas and suggestions.

1. Have you visited or are you familiar with any of the following web-based services at www.teensmart.net?

• Health, Risk and Protective Profile Surveys    Yes No
• Virtual Consultation/Ask a Nurse    Yes No
• TeenSmart Course     Yes No
• Health Topics    Yes No
• Internet Links     Yes No
• Resources in Your Community     Yes No
• Case Studies   Yes No
• Frequently Asked Questions  Yes No

2. Did you find the website format easy to follow?

Very confusing Somewhat confusing Somewhat easy to follow Very easy to follow
Comments:

3. Did you find the online instructions easy to follow?

Very confusing Somewhat confusing Somewhat easy to follow Very easy to follow
Comments:

4. Do you think the participants liked the graphics and design?

Not at all A little Somewhat A lot
Comments:

5. Was the website organized in a logical manner?

Very confusing Somewhat confusing Somewhat easy to follow Very easy to follow
Comments:

6. Was the content easy to read for adolescents?

Very difficult Somewhat difficult Somewhat easy  Very easy
Comments:

7. How well was the website able to hold the participants’s attention?

Not at all A little Quiet a bit Very well
Comments:

8. Do you think the reading sections were too long for the participants?

Way too long Somewhat long Not long  Short
Comments:

9. Do you think the website provided the information participants were seeking?

No Yes
Comments:

10. Do you think the participants enjoyed having access to the materials both in English and in Spanish?

No Yes
Comments:

11. Do you think the participants found the information on the website (e.g. content related to alcohol, tobacco, drugs, sex, nutrition, stress and violence) relevant to their lives?

No, not at all  A little Quite a bit Very much so
Comments:

12. Do you think the participants found the information on the website (e.g. content related to alcohol, tobacco, drugs, sex, nutrition, stress and violence) relevant according to their gender?

No, not at all A little Quite a bit Very much so
Comments:

13. Do you think the participants found the information on the website (e.g. content related to alcohol, tobacco, drugs, sex, nutrition, stress and violence) culturally appropriate?

No, not at all  A little Quite a bit Very much so
Comments:

14. Do you think the participants found the information on the website (e.g. content related to alcohol, tobacco, drugs, sex, nutrition, stress and violence) socio-economically relevant to their lives?

No, not at all  A little Quite a bit Very much so
Comments:

15. Do you think the participants found the information on the website (e.g. content related to alcohol, tobacco, drugs, sex, nutrition, stress and violence) helpful in personal decision-making?

No, not at all A little Quite a bit Very much so
Comments:

Reflection/Exercises

1. Do you think the participants learned from the problem-based case studies? (or vignettes)

No, not at all A little Quite a bit Very much so
Comments:

2. Do you think the participants learned from the writing exercises?

No, not at all A little Quite a bit Very much so
Comments:

3. Were the participants able to share with others concepts they learned?

No, not at all A little Quite a bit Very much so
Comments:

4. Do you think the participants learned from the comments of their virtual facilitators?

No, not at all A little Somewhat A lot
Comments:

Technical Evaluation of the website

1. What was the access to computer lab (with internet connection) in your institution?

We did not have access to computers
The access to the computer lab was very limited
We had computer access most of the time
We always had computer access

2. Do you think not having sufficient access to a computer limit the participation of teens in accessing the TeenSmart website?

No, not at all A little Somewhat A lot
Comments:

3. Do you think not having Internet connectivity was a barrier for participants in accessing the TeenSmart website?

No, de ninguna manera A little Somewhat A lot
Comments:

4. Do you think lack of sufficient computer memory limited the use of the TeenSmart website?

No, de ninguna manera A little Somewhat A lot
  Don’t know
Comments:

5. Do you think the lack of software or communication programs (e.g. Adobe) was a limit for effective use of the website?
No, not at all A little Somewhat A lot
  Don’t know
Comments:

6. Do you think overcoming fear of computer technology was a barrier for using the TeenSmart website?
No, not at all A little A little A lot
Comments:

7. Do you think resistance to new ways of teaching a barrier to integrating the use of the TeenSmart web-based tools into existing curriculum?
No, not at all A little Somewhat A lot
Comments:

8. Do you think integrating TeenSmart methods and materials into existing programs and or curriculum was a challenge?
  No, not at all A little Somewhat A lot